gravimetrics, gravity, warp-drive-simulation, space-entanglement, flyby-anomaly, space-propulsion, weak-equivalence-principle, einstein, general relativity, gauge-field-potential, radiation-decay-rate, density-relativistic-quantum-vacuum, violation einstein equivalence principle, quantum-gravity, cause of gravity
Einstein was wrong assuming that Gravity is caused by mass - Gravity is caused by a matter -antimatter energy potential by mass (quarks) in view to the quantum vacuum and vice versa.
In order to tell mass from energy in a quantized potential, an observer has to take into account the plane of the measurement. Gravity can be "translated" as an approximation into a classical view (classical physics), by applying the Euler Lagrangian Potential in view to the Euler identity (Geometry), for instance in a zero gravity flight: this is a local measurement for the observer.
Gravity is induced by the disassociation of space fields by matter fields and vice versa: a non-commutative gauge field potential - no one point particles but fields with dimensions.
Mark Aaron Simpson, String Theory Development Group, Facebook:
Quote "The better terminology is associate / disassociate, to describe how fields entangle or disengage in gravity field effects. Gravity is observed when matter, which has Mass, is occupying free space. The space within the matter fields is interleaved with the fields present in the free space topology. Keep in mind the matter is also mostly space, but what makes quantum space unique is that the fields are complex forms of the fields found in free space. So, Relocating matter in free space does require a force is applied, due to the field relationships that localize to the Matter of example. Finally , the Mass is generated by the special fields within the protons called the quark fields, which have a very special dimensional field I personally call hyperspace, due to the complexity of the topology of the fields. This hyperspace does interleave with the gravitometric loops in free space, [emergent field theory] and therfore has a observable property as far interleaving entire matter wave systems over free space.
Even though we presently use mechanical force to relocate matter with Mass and move it along in space, we could also change the relationship of the fields to each other and move objects through space without force (against gravity). It would require energy to change the field relationships, but the requirement would be much lower than what we employ now with propulsion and ion engines. So Newtonian gravity calculations provide one type of energy calculation based on the fields remaining intact, while the hyperspace energy calculations must take into account the change of the fields, and then calculate a spacial topology for the encapsulation that sets a topology bias in free space that induces transport. Additionally the encapsulation field must also be adjustable so as to place the transport at the desired location (intact). So, the better terminology is to say we disassociate the spacial fields within matter from the free space fields surrounding matter, so as to encapsulate the inner fields from the outer fields in free space. "
Fluorine Logical Lattice
Original art modulus : Gregory Dotson
Modified Art and Theory : Mark Aaron Simpson
I think one of the basic differences in thinking, with regard to force versus simply "potential" is whether you need to discuss gravity with respect to A: 2 matter-wave objects and space between them, or B: 1 matter-wave object and a field in free space topology. To advance the physics, we must begin to describe the field as the reference frame from gravitometrics, and therefor be concerned only with the object (matter-waves) of focus. The object recalculates it's own position in space-time constantly, and when the fields are inducible for gravitometric effect, the object (matter-waves) become asymmetric and induce inertia. There is a bias on the matter-wave system that transports it in reference to the fields in free space. Whether this is a field produced by a larger object, or artificially is not important. For the future of physics, we need to design and demonstrate the artificial fields so this can be shown as accurate, once and for all. I think some recent templates have the qualities for such a field-bias inducement. That is all I want to say at this time.
The focus of gravimetrics has moved away from a "graviton" particle explanation , toward a field oriented potential model. So, an answer about gravitons as a force carrier is incorrect on 2 issues. gravity is not a force (it is a field potential), and it is not particle related (it is expressed in spinor syntax as spacial data)." Unquote
JUNO Earth flyby, Artist's Illustration, Credit: NASA
There is a violation of the Einstein's Equivalence Principle (WEP (Weak Equivalence Principle) and Strong EP): when you quantize space-time at Planck Scale, you will detect that there is no time as such but energy scaling: the relativistic Quantum Vacuum can be compared to a perfect fluid (fluid dynamics) - there is an impact of the solar neutrino (- Oscillation-) to radiation decay rates and the fine structure constant Alpha.
Quote of Charles A. Laster, comments section: http:/
Neutrinos can have a mass (Koide formular) and the solar neutrino is very likely to oscillate.
We can look upon the wave function of the electron as a confined helical wave with a forward component (zig) and a reverse component (zag), that explains the zig-zag of the electron.
Neutrinos without any mass would be a left-handed spinor, comparable to the forward zig -wave of an electron. In case they have a tiny mass and are able to oscillate, it is possible that they interact with the vacuum field as part of a reverse zag wave.
A matter field with a heterogeneous composition ( e.g. a planet like Jupiter), is therefore likely to induce gravitational anomalies, and by that changing the requirements for a proper navigation (in the Jovian Belt).
The relativistic quantum vacuum changes its "density" according to the position of celestial bodies to each other (in the solar system, mostly perihelion/aphelion phases).
In order to give more evidence:
"It thus becomes apparent that the same type of shifting eﬀect as that noted
in  could conceivably occur, depending on the choice of gravitational potentials aﬀecting the VEP oscillations. Whereas before it was thought that
VEP oscillations were singly dependent on the product Φ∆fij, these results suggest that perhaps the value of the background potential Φ can indeed
be constrained by the resultant neutrino data. The ﬁgures presented here
immediately determine the observed energy spectrum of 8B neutrinos, and
many future neutrino observatories could detect these variations. As with
the results in [7, 14], it is found that the shapes of the probabilities are
strongly determined by the size of θ13, and small 13–angle oscillations provide a much more diverse spectrum of hP(νe → νe)i curves for diﬀerent
input values (in this case, the potential Φ).
Alternatively, what could also solve such a problem, should VEP be the
mechanism at work, is the detection and subsequent spectrum analysis of
extra–solar neutrinos from sources whose gravitational potential is known
to either great accuracy or reliability. Various papers have addressed the
detection of such high–energy intergalactic neutrinos subject to the VEP
Additionally, the discovery of a possible “gravitationally– induced quantum phase” was recently discussed in the literature . While the reference
treatment deals with MSW neutrinos which can possibly experience a phase
shift due to interactions with strong gravitational sources, it may be possible to extend the analogy to VEP neutrinos . Should such an extension
be possible, then it may be possible to determine the potential felt in the
vicinity of the Sun, since the gravitationally– induced quantum mechanical
phases of  would be functions of the source potential (hence the product
∆fijΦSource, and not just the product ∆fijΦSolarSystem. These conclusions
are as of yet unveriﬁed.
This is to be seen in view of the zig-zag (Zitterbewegung) of the electron and the oscillating neutrino that is supposed to have a mass:
‘In the zigzag picture of a Dirac particle, the vertices may be viewed as interactions with the (constant) Higgs field.’ Because the mass of the particle is acquired as it interacts with the constant mass vacuum field quanta at the vertices (some kind of mass-producing field, not necessarily any particular speculative Higgs boson, which has never been observed), it follows that the ‘coupling constant’ for the interaction must be different where the resultant particles are different in mass: the coupling per vertice (there are two vertices needed for each complete cycle of de Broglie wave oscillation as the particle moves in the zigzag motion) is a square root factor which apparently explains the Koide formula for leptons, including Carl Brannen’s modification for neutrino masses. This results from the decomposition of Dirac’s spinor into a 2-spinor form by Weyl in 1929, where one component of the spinor is left handed and the other right handed. A truly massless neutrino would be an entirely left-handed spinor, like just the zig part of the zigzag motion of an electron. But if they have a small mass an can change flavour (as observed for solar neutrinos), neutrinos must occasionally interact with a massive vacuum field and therefore have a very small zag component."
Flyby Anomaly, Credit: ArXivBlog
The (Earth) flyby anomaly is observed in non-closed, hyperbolic orbits.
Inertial mass is equivalent to gravitational mass, but according to gravitometrics and the relativistic quantum vacuum (also quantum fluctuations) , this may not always be true. Gravity is not a force but a non-commutative gauge field potential, the disassociation of space fields by matter fields. Is f=ma the same as F= G m1 m2 /r^2?
May be not, due to Quantum flucatuations and the relativistic quantum vacuum. Radiation decay rates are not a constant due to celestial bodies and the "density" of the relativistic quantum vacuum in the aphelion and perihelion phase. Energy behaves like a perfect liquid (superfluid), as CERN has confirmed recently. The quantum vacuum between two celestial bodies behaves like a bubble of air below water.
Gravity propagates at any speed, it is a space intrinsic entanglement. An object on Earth is not "falling down", this is just our observation: it recalculates the fields! Einstein's field equations just describe the effect of gravity in case the fields stay intact. By the Navier Stokes Existence and smoothness problem you may be able to derive a warp drive simulation.
Testing the Violation of the Equivalence Principle on a Stellar Triple System with a Pulsar in order to find a new theory about Gravity.
German Website about Gravimetrics and Flyby Anomaly
The Road to Quantum Gravity and Violation of WEP, further reading
I have the impression, that time is including the vis viva potential (by Leibniz), hence in the 3 body problem, there is an INFINITE amount of equations. Quantum Gravity is literally: gravity (gauge field potential) by entangled (QM) space. Because gravity is the disassociation of space fields by matter fields.
Gravity is not a force inducing a pull (downwards on a huge matter field, a planet). Gravity is a residuing potential due to the disassociation of space fields by matter fields, a non-commutative gauge field potential.
Hence objects are not pulled but recalculate the fields instanteneously via space entangelment, relocalize objects.
There is no attraction, There is a residual gauge potential. There is no curved space and no distortion of space-time. Therefore gravity is not a force.
Everything in the universe is moving. A matter field in acceleration has to obey the laws of energy conservation.
Moreover, there is a violation of Einstein's Principle of Equivalence:
"The system gives the scientists the best opportunity yet to discover a violation of a concept called the Equivalence Principle. This principle states that the effect of gravity on a body does not depend on the nature or internal structure of that body.
"While Einstein's Theory of General Relativity has so far been confirmed by every experiment, it is not compatible with quantum theory. Because of that, physicists expect that it will break down under extreme conditions," Ransom explained. "This triple system of compact stars gives us a great opportunity to look for a violation of a specific form of the equivalence principle called the Strong Equivalence Principle," he added."
And now: ""By doing very high-precision timing of the pulses coming from the pulsar, we can test for such a deviation from the strong equivalence principle at a sensitivity several orders of magnitude greater than ever before available," said Ingrid Stairs of the University of British Columbia. "Finding a deviation from the Strong Equivalence Principle would indicate a breakdown of General Relativity and would point us toward a new, correct theory of gravity," she added."
In deutscher Sprache: Theorie der Gravitation als Eichfeldpotential
String Theory Development Educational Page: FaTe Model Page (Facebook).
Well, NASA and ESA didn't deliver the doppler deviation data by JUNO during the Earth flyby on October 9th, 2013. Moreover JUNO went into safe mode during the Government shut down and flyby manoever.
Hence no data, neither from ISON. The flyby anomaly is a test for gravimetrics, so lets wait for JUNO's data in the Jovian system. There should be a deviation within navigation in the Jovian system.
Oliver Thewalt 573 days ago