Oliver Thewalt

    Oliver Thewalt

    Theoretical Physics | Quantum Biology | Dark Matter Research Cluster

    Latest comments


    Preliminary Information about the Matter Creation Process in the Higgs-Field

    Some Explanations:

    These are some preliminary information about Dark Matter Research by Michael Balmer and Oliver Thewalt in order to give more evidence. This work is still unpublished due to the Peer Review System of Cornell (ArXiv) and a lack of Funding concerning my side. What is still missing is to get more empirical evidence, which was until today not granted by NASA/JPL or ESA or any other Organization in charge.

     

    As Michael Balmer has pointed out, we will have a new point of view on the Hydrogen Atom concerning its electronuclear and nuclear configuration (Designation Shell).

     

    I will publish the communication with NASA PR and Juno Mission in short.

     

    I will answer to specific questions only. This is still unfinished but has a very sound basis. I remind that most information is still unpublished for the reasons given above, but I will add explanations as soon as possible.

     

    Researchers are missing the possibility of an experiment in space.

     

    N Z/e -> Ve/quark-gluon on e H


    e + Ve (MSQ) N (MSQ 1) Ze = H


    DM : Photon (MSQ) + Ve (MSQ) + N (uncharged/unused)


    Annihilation: Photon neg. + photon + (via neg space/string) e (DE) - Z (DM)


    Z(DM) equals N(MSQ 1) + Ve (MSQ 1) results in Matter


    Z(DM) results in N (MSQ 1) +Ve (MSQ 1)(matter) via string space (neg charge) -e space Topo


    Higgs related to neg e string via Ve (keep apart Proton electron) --


    Quantum tunneling of e via QCD | Ve (electron neutrino) oscillates!


    Thus DM explains matter – antimatter symmetry break


    there is only matter/antimatter no DM AM (shielding/no charge)


    no gain no loss (Einstein) gravity is within the higgs string field (- e space neg!) –pull/push


    DM via Higgs string field different gravity DE! Is uncharged!

     

    The anti H1 has a positron and a negative proton in its nucleus.

     

    In QCD the anti H1 nucleus is unchanged.

     

    The nuclei annihilation is the complete conversion of matter to energy and its cosmic gamma ray or high energy photon.

     

    The swirl function with the neutron and gluons is a strong force phenomenon and only occurs in the nucleus, it is about the workings of the gluons in holding the quarks together, it is a QCD not taught.

    The Higgs is about the formation of elements.

     

    The nucleus of anti hydrogen is a negative proton. To make it a negative proton, the up and down quarks must be reversed.
    The neutron is made up of two up neg which is 1/3 and one down pos which is 2/3.

    The proton is two up positives and one down negative


    H has a proton and an anti H has a neutron in its nucleus.

    This is why it will not annihilate.
     
    The Neutrino is its own Anti: assuming an electron neutrino Ve-, the anti neutrino would be Ve+
    that would be emit as a positron, that cannot happen in nature.
     
     
    Further Reading:

     

    How and why quarks conjugate by Michael Balmer

     

    Particle Pair Production by Michael Balmer

     

    Particles Faster than light

     

    Particles faster than Light 2 by Michael Balmer

     

     

    Hydrogen

     

    Neutrinos and p-violation

     

    Theoretical Physics beyond Dirac and the Standard Model:

    A Black Hole State  by Oliver Thewalt

     

    Zero in Physics by Oliver Thewalt

    Imaginary negative mass in a beyond Dirac world view – seen from (higgs) string vacua foldings - BH identity - electron orbital by Oliver Thewalt

     

    A theory about the cause of gravity

     

    Why in a beyond Dirac World View the positron is not the anti-electron

     

    The Region of Neutrality as threshold between the quantum and non-quantum world

     

    ----------

     

    e-Mail and Phone Communication with NASA Juno Mission, PR Officials and Staff

     

    To: dwayne.c.brown  (AT) nasa (dot) gov
    From: Neogrid eV Oliver Thewalt <thewalt (AT) neogrid (dot) de>
    Subject: JUNO Earth flyby / Contact

    Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 17:02:05 +0200

    JUNO Earth flyby / Contact

    Dear Sir,

    I just have called you by phone and gave you a brief summary about my request,
    mainly about possible doppler deviation data of the JUNO Earth flyby on October 9th 2013.

    I am an independent researcher in theoretical physics.

    The reason for this request is to test a new theory about gravity which can show a possible violation of Einstein's Equivalence Principle
    and some conclusions about mass/energy and the charge identity.

    Have a look at for instance here

    https://public.nrao.edu/news/pressreleases/pulsar-in-stellar-triple-system

    May be you can give me the contact data of a related scientist.

    Sincerely Yours

    Oliver Thewalt

     
    CC: Giovanna Morigi <giovanna.morigi (AT) physik.uni-saarland (dot) de>,
    duncan.lorimer (AT) mail.wvu (dot) edu
    To: dwayne.c.brown (AT) nasa (dot) gov
    From: Neogrid eV Oliver Thewalt <thewalt (AT) neogrid (dot) de>
    Subject: Gravity

    Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 12:47:41 +0200
     
    Dear Sir or Madam,

    I am just giving you some more explanations:

    The non-commutative gauge-field potential is just an effect which we may apply for a technology - it is not about the cause - Newton made a mistake assigning gravity to a fundamental force of nature - gravity is ultimately an intrinsic part of the quantum vacuum -- there is a lot more to say and a lot more research that we could publish but people do even not understand the most basic things such as that the photon can have a mass - the concept of mass is flawed anyway, the decisive part is to understand what is mass in view to energy - energy is a bad concept as well - and then to understand the following : --

    Theorizing a speed of light is a bad concept because this can NEVER be a constant - the better concept would be theorizing a SPEED OF LIGHT THRESHOLD which is mediating and itself being mediated in view to the aboslute zero within a photonic (BH to photon bridge (BH <-> particle) mediation -- the maths (RIemann Zeta) is just giving an approximation:

    ...the universe is just a random constellation, there is no "outer" infinity but innner, infinity is mediated itself (think about Renormalization, Bjorken Scaling, QCD - Hadrons) AND mediates via QCD, for instance for

    z= -1 (Zeta) --> infinity = - 1/12 (Ramanujan)

    The terminology of infinity (stretching the Zero to + infinity and - infinity in an n-fractal matrix (density)) is neither implying a constant nor absolute infinity but mediates convergence and divergence criteria for Stability Constraints of Matter (Riemann Zeta Function).

    https://www.facebook.com/oliver.thewalt/posts/10154369781226473

    https://twitter.com/MarcioRdeGMaia/status/564407767164010497

    Sincerely Yours

    Oliver Thewalt
     
     
    BCC: Giovanna Morigi <giovanna.morigi (AT) physik.uni-saarland (dot) de>,
    Stefan.Schael (AT) physik.rwth-aachen (dot) de
    Subject: Re: Gravity/Dark Matter - Positrons
    To: dwayne.c.brown (AT) nasa (dot) gov
    From: Neogrid eV Oliver Thewalt <thewalt (AT) neogrid (dot) de>

    Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 14:29:33 +0200
     
     Dear Sir or Madam.

    I am including some additional explantions to my request:


    @destop Do you agree with this article?

    http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2013/nov/27/does-the-positron-excess-really-exist

    https://twitter.com/destop/status/424804026669363200

    @Hixgrid I don't have the details if measrmnt so difficult to agree/disagree. But model of absorption of cosmic rays more reasonable.

    https://twitter.com/Hixgrid/status/424798176143368192

    @destop True, how to measure positrons? plasma ejecta of the sun are protons, but arr annihilating with photons at the atmosphere = positrons!

    @destop But there is no annihilation with Dark Matter, DM is not interacting with (ionized) atoms, DM is unused and uncharged.

    Einstein was wrong assuming that Gravity is caused by mass - Gravity is caused by a matter -antimatter energy potential by mass (quarks) in view to the quantum vacuum and vice versa.
    In order to tell mass from energy in a quantized potential, an observer has to take into account the plane of the measurement. Gravity can be "translated" as an approximation into a classical view (classical physics), by applying the Euler Lagrangian Potential in view to the Euler identity (Geometry), for instance in a zero gravity flight: this is a local measurement for the observer.
    Gravity is induced by the disassociation of space fields by matter fields and vice versa: a non-commutative gauge field potential - no one point particles but fields with dimensions.
    here is a violation of the Einstein's Equivalence Principle (WEP (Weak Equivalence Principle) and Strong EP): when you quantize space-time at Planck Scale, you will detect that there is no time as such but energy scaling: the relativistic Quantum Vacuum can be compared to a perfect fluid (fluid dynamics) - there is an impact of the solar neutrino (- Oscillation-) to radiation decay rates and the fine structure constant Alpha.
    NASA and ESA didn't deliver the doppler deviation data by JUNO during the Earth flyby on October 9th, 2013. Moreover JUNO went into safe mode during the Government shut down and flyby manoever.
    Hence no data, neither from ISON. The flyby anomaly is a test for a new theory about gravity so lets wait for JUNO's data in the Jovian system. There should be a deviation within navigation in the Jovian system.

    https://public.nrao.edu/news/pressreleases/pulsar-in-stellar-triple-system

    https://www.facebook.com/oliver.thewalt/posts/10154369781226473
     
     
    Subject: Fwd: Re: Gravity/Dark Matter - Positrons

    To: agle (AT) jpl.nasa (dot) gov
    From: Neogrid eV Oliver Thewalt <thewalt (AT) neogrid (dot) de>

    Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 16:20:08 +0200
     
    Dear Mr. Agle,

    I will try to reach you soon by phone.


    I forward this eMail conversation to your kind attention.


    Sincerely Yours


    Oliver Thewalt


    Hixgrid / Theoretical Physics / Quantum Biology
     
    From: "Agle, David C (1872)" <david.c.agle (AT) jpl.nasa (dot) gov>
    To: Hixgrid <science (AT) hixgrid (dot) de>
    Subject: Automatic reply: Of Charme and strangeness
    Thread-Topic: Of Charme and strangeness
    Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 10:48:22 +0000
     
     

    Hello,

    Thank you for your email. I am off lab today — returning next Monday. If you are a member of the media and require immediate assistance please contact JPL media relations at: ***.

    Thank you,

    DC Agle