Theoretical Physics | Quantum Biology | Dark Matter Research Cluster

- Oliver Thewalt on eMail Conversation with Professor Jonathan Vos Post (): hello dear Jonathan, so where is my Nobel now? You only earn money when you...
- Oliver Thewalt on About Dengue and Zika, Vaccination and Dengue test (): They want to sell this dengue test,and it says nothing ... I have seen people,...
- Oliver Thewalt on About Cancer (): http://www.zmescience.com/science/physics/cancer-safe-mode-mechanism-402343/
- Oliver Thewalt on About Cancer (): apoptosis - kind of body mind side effect with a strong link to radiation and...

antimatter, demokratie, black hole, bildungsdiktatur, nicola sacca mwaev saarland, oliver thewalt, werner asch mwaev saarland, werner asch mwaev referat d6 energie und klimaschutzpolitik, werner asch ministerium für wirtschaft arbeit energie verkehr saarland, nicola saccà mwaev referat d6 energie und klimaschutzpolitik, nicola saccà ministerium für wirtschaft arbeit energie verkehr saarland, jürgen barke staatssekretär im mwaev saarland, jürgen barke staatssekretär im ministerium für wirtschaft arbeit energie verkehr saarland, dark matter, johanna wanka, bundesministerium für bildung und forschung johanna wanka, bundesbildungsministerin, bundesministerium für bildung und forschung, phase transition, education, neutron, gravity, michael balmer, mass, higgs-field, photon, neutrino, autism, black hole state, johanna wanke bundesbildungsministerin, mathematics, time, einstein, cdc, hydrogen, proton, quarks, qcd, dark matter field, bildung, autismus, vaxxed, science, energy, positron, ramanujan, dimension, kinder, wahlmanipulation, quantum vacuum

Discussing the paper: Gluon flux-tube distribution and linear confinement in baryons

The better terminology than Hadrons are "shaped" is that Hadrons are taped and folded, a dimensional "transiting gate" folding", the "colors" are derived from QCD thinking box, but Chromodynamics is blending out the swirl, and the color swirl about the gluons is about the "quantum flux" within a quantum shielding transition: given the assertion that antimatter is shielded on quantum level, when does the proton start to annihilate with matter or "antimatter", (proton - >neutron -> neutrino --> phase transition (2D world (string 0 to string fold fract n sheet) at the 0 to n-fract horizons which are about an anti color magnetic "swirling" or better stated dimensional transiting of the (Yang Mills) foldings at the horizons (particle shape to energy "bonding potential (this is about the entropy and degrees of freedom within the superfluid like density matrix (granularity of the dimensional qvacuum) -- The decisive points are the positive charge identity, is not a charge identity in this BH state world view on quantum level but a state carrier mediation matrix for bonding or folding potentials, the magnetic monopol notion is about the bonding potentials: String break in QCD can be found here, there is then no Landau Pole, but the Landau Pole can be theorized within renormalization, but in the BH state world view which behave like quantum mechanics to classic mechanics - here BH state world view to quantum mechanics (QM are not comprising preexistent BH state (carriers, magnetic monopol notion for the photon, the mass of the photon is measureable just in view to pair production, in a BEC or condensated mass world view) .....

Yes, Ulla, you are right, in a nutSHELL, this is about the foundation for Paul's exclusion principle, and now we know why finding out Mass or Energy levels are secondary, finding out preexistent folding or bonding "potentials" would be more important because these are quasi FTL phenomena, not obeying QM - the toplogical phase transition can be better understood then, entanglement and superpsoition as well, these states are not just correlated because the locality is no more distinct as such.

Remember, the assertion that "light" cannot escape a Black Hole is just a tautology .... photon and neutrino are "enabled" at 0-string horizons.

https://www.facebook.com/ulla.mattfolk/posts/10206530412258592

Ulla Mattfolk: I have tried to find some model for a hadron, but so many different suggestions.

Oliver Thewalt: Forget about the Hadron, start with Partons and Bjorken scaling for a foundation http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Introduction_to_Parton_Distribution_Functions http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Bjorken_scaling

and then try to detect the seemingly cause, within a "classic measurement" why scientists think they observe something -- the QCD is no more the best model we should have, just too "box like" think out of the box, the anti gluon colors are swirling, yes, but why do we think we observe this? forget about the positron, the positron is NOT the anti electron in this world view ---- efimov states and penta quarks are about folding and bonding, the q threshold is a "reverse" electrostatic energy confinement which results seemingly in the Yukawa potential - there is the first tautology - the nuclei have no linear energy bonding - when you enlarge the distance, then the bonding potential gets stronger, because in a point of view of a space layered topological phase transition, you have even raised this bonding potential transiting from BH states (comparable to an electrostatic upload from the litosphere to the qvacuum - TGF or flashlight in a thunderstorm (the energy has no direction but the quantum flux are propagating in a releasing wave transition from the lithosphere to the ionosphere, "upwards" while the dim barrier is propagating "downwards" until there is no more sufficient gamma ray release potential (antimatter)) and at the "string break" this must be a qthreshold mediated by the photon and neutrino in view to the properties of the dimension (granularity or fractal matrix for phase transition): Hadrons are just an interim state.

Remember, the assertion that "light" cannot escape a Black Hole is just a tautology .... photon and neutrino are "enabled" at 0-string horizons.

https://www.facebook.com/ulla.mattfolk/posts/10206530412258592

Ulla Mattfolk: I have tried to find some model for a hadron, but so many different suggestions.

Oliver Thewalt: Forget about the Hadron, start with Partons and Bjorken scaling for a foundation http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Introduction_to_Parton_Distribution_Functions http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Bjorken_scaling

In Physics there is no final state, a "stable" state is an interpretation by scientists, which has to be translated for laymen: there is no stable state as such, a BEC is just an approximation by mathematical means. The decisive point to understand is the "phase transition" and that the quest for the phase transition can be looked upon several points of view: you can analogize the universe by the atomic structure, the question for a beginning and end is a human question, does not exist in nature as such, the model about phases of existence and non-existence is an approach (Ansatz) which is more appropriate in order to understand quasi FTL observations or phenomena such as Gravity, Dark Matter or Black Holes.

What is a measurement in QM? Here an excerpt by Lubos Motl:

Quote: "Also, these people are confused about the very concept of a measurement – even outside the black hole context. They think that a measurement recovers the complex amplitudes in a superposition. But a measurement never does – and the complex amplitudes (in the wave function) are not measurable. Technically, they are not observables. A measurement always produces Boolean or "classical" information as the answer to a particular question about observables (all observables are represented by linear operators). When a measurement takes place, a "qubit" is transformed into a regular "classical bit"." Unquote

(The Reference Frame: "How you surely can't recover information from a black hole" by Lubos Motl)

In QM there is no state, we create a state by a mesurement (look up loopholes, Violation of Bell's inequalities).

The motivation is to develop an understanding for those quasi FTL phenomena, because the interpretation of observations cannot be derived by neither Einstein's world view of invariance/covariance nor Dirac's wolrd view of matter -antimatter as such.

The topological phase transition (start here please: https://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/2016/advanced-physicsprize2016.pdf) can be modeled by higgs string vacua fermion foldings within sapce topology (for the Maths: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borromean_rings, http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Folding.html)

This you can apply to the nuclear shell model by modelling the electrons outer configuration, having in mind that the positron is not the anti electron in this wolrd view, and that the neutrino is his own anti.

This is why every particle can be matter or antimatter due to its charge identity. This helps to explain Pauli's excluion principle: The foundation for Pauli can be found by the assertion that electrons and positrons cannot occupy the same "space" (space topology?) by a different spin (chirality (fermions)/ helicity (photons), charge (no positive charge identity in the "real world ("below" a speed of light threshold (photonic mediation)) or oscillation (spatial alignment by neutrinos, phase transition).

In a Black Hole state world view, there is not positive charge identity, which would be from the point of view of Einstein's world view a FTL charge identity (positron). Einstein's and Dirac's world view cannot explain Dark Matter, neither the Higgs Field.

Why are fermions invariant after a rotation of 720 degrees, and bosons after a rotation of 360 degrees?

This is there your understanding for the fermion foldings and the interpretation for energy scaling should start.

Gauß has pointed out, that gauge invariance is based on a tautology.

In order to understand this for quarks/gluons, we model the swirl of the (anti) gluon color. The swirl function is a mathematical tool.

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Swirl.html