Oliver Thewalt

    Oliver Thewalt

    Theoretical Physics | Quantum Biology | Dark Matter Research Cluster

    Latest comments

    Zero in Physics

    The Zero in Physics

    Zero in physics is a quantum threshold between existence and non-existence which is basically the "same", but distinguishable by the speed of light threshold (BH to photon mediation for particles (QCD): - infinity  to + infinity is the range for zero, existence means  a BH state by a photonic mediation for matter (condensation, Yang Mills SU(5) to AdS5 phase space, Higgs field string  for neg. -e) by the infinity mediation (Riemann Zeta for Ramanujans infinity conjecture (for instance for z = -1 (Zeta) <-> infinity = -1/12 (Ramanujan).


    We should theorise what zero means for physics and existence  - the absolute zero of the quantum vacuum (energy scaling, neutrinos, temperature below zero Kelvin (inverse Boltzmann distribution). What means energy towards mass, or better stated, why can mass not "exist" without a tachyonic charge identity? Is "antimatter" stable on quantum level? What means radiation? What is a magnetic monopol? Is there "antimatter" in a tachyonic world view? Is there antimatter beyond the apparent horizons? 


    Why does known maths not comprise the tachyonic world or the matter creation process in the Higgs field?


    This is why the Zero is VOID as such in this world view as just derived from ||C.  Euler identity is not sufficient, the same for (X,\|\cdot \|)


    We have radical -1 = 0 and this --> The Secret Ancient History Of The Higgs Search
    (Post from 2012: The quest for Dark Matter, Topomatter and Symmetry within Maths and the Higgs Boson





    There is no zero as such in physics - the apparent horizons give an APPROXIMATION, but "there" the photonic mediation for existence is enabled by neutrino BH States - I assume that neutrinos and photons split there as a seggregation of a BH state (positron annihilation in QCD (gluons taping quarks) by photon and neutrino, assigning mass to fermions in a n-FRACTAL dimensional transition in a photonic BH to Planck Density super fluid like matrix:  a dimension is about the granularity of the quantum vacuum which can be treated like a perfect fluid - dimension = fractal (photonic) [Planckian] density matrix.


    Inertia is within the antimatter identity and the foundation for Pauli's exclusion principle:


    Positrons are not occupying the same space as electrons - by a different spin, oscillation and charge respectively.


    Hence our Maths is not sufficient: apply maths for a Navier Stokes Superfluid in this definition of a dimension, the zero values for the Riemann Zeta (prime numbers) are just MEDIATED UNIQUELY (Efimov "multi quark" states (have a look at   Aharonov bohm effect ): quarks are doing a swirl function, Michael Balmer will explain more: where is the antimatter, where uud -ddu /ddu -uud /Proton /Neutron, what is the neutron in view to neutrinos?).





    The zero is not just a quantum threshold between existence and non existence but comprises the string vacua in terms of Superstring "groups" (but not gauging) to fermions and bosons but as Exciton Majorana like states --> the folding of the strings represent the inverse (Boltzmann Brain) entropy as degrees of freedom via the vacua (fermions invariant after 720 degree rotation...)  ..now a rectangular triangle has an angle sum over 180 degree  .... in fact Euclidian maths and the circle number Pi are void  --- the void itself (or zero) is UNFOLDING at BH states: Black Hole to particle (see also mass defect, nuclear shell model, Maria Goeppert-Mayer Nuclear Shell Model).

    Short Summary for Students 


    There is no zero as such, when you want to explain phenomena which have no direct "FTL" connection, you may apply time dependent models, for instance when you explain the physics for car driving this is sufficient, but when you want to explain phenomena like gravity, dark matter or black holes then you need to overcome the world view of a speed og light as transport through space: the better concept is to look upon the speed of light as a speed of light (quantum) threshold. There is then no above or below "speed of light" but a threshold between matter and energy: this theshold is comprised by the "zero" but the zero as such does not exist: it unfolds at a Black Hole (virtual) state which represents basically the commutation "between" existence and non-existence by a  photonic Black Hole to particle mediation via neutrinos and the strong and electroweak force. There is a tachyonic charge identity (the positron) which enables gluons taping quarks, and by that mass. World view of phases of existence and non - existence.

     Hence the positron is not just a (tachyonic) charge identity but a phase transition between matter and energy. What we called antimatter is shielded below the speed of light threshold and unstable at quantum level.



    Michael Balmer, 01. Jan 2015, 10:21 AM

    " matter,antimatter,dark matter,what about dark antimatter?what puts this all in conflict and turmoil is each persons subscribing to the term,in Susy it is the anti-"partner" some say the opposite charge sign,some just think it is the evil twin out to get us,the opposite of the normal be it in observation of the negative or the positive it doesn't matter,the equality of distribution in infinity is a localized field represented by EMFields and Matter fields,in some areas such as Plasma Field of positive ions it is balance to antimatter but antimatter is unstable unshielded at the quantum level and at the macro level though still unstable and radioactive it's quantity is sufficient to maintain it's ability not to annihilate at once giving it's long half life this aided by the so called dark matter field separating the EMField at that point,the dark matter field acts as an insulator against the annihilation process,again, this is not at every point in space of this situation,when researching this on a quantum level the antimatter particles are not separate entities of matter but the same atom carrying it's anti charge, a proton and electron are by virtue of the opposing charge matter and anti matter to each other and not being the same means nothing ... 


    ...the charge to mass ratio of the electron to the proton will show you this, it may be smaller but pound for pound as the saying goes puts it on an even field,now you can charge conjugate an atom and classify it as antimatter as well...nature does it all the time...this is where the positron appears"